Bartender Geek [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Xiphias Gladius

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Just got back from seeing Iron Man [May. 9th, 2008|08:05 pm]
I did enjoy it quite a bit. But I'm finding that the part of superhero movies which I'm LEAST interested in is the superhero battles. They're, y'know, boring. Fight scenes which are done by stuntmen and martial artists -- those are cool. But fight scenes done by CGI? Well, if they've got good dialogue and one-liners, they're fine.
But CGI has gotten good enough that it's boring. I mean, I think I actually preferred the CGI in Babylon Five -- because they were always pushing the envelope and trying new things. Now, people can do the CGI well -- and it's boring.

So I find myself just sort of vaguely watching the battles, and waiting for them to get back to the bits where the people are talking to each other.

The bits where Tony is building and testing his suit, though -- those are CGI-heavy, AND fun. So it CAN be done -- CGI is hardly a scene-killer. It's just -- we're past the point where CGI is cool.
Link11 comments|Leave a comment

Sometimes, someone lucks out and gets me as their bartender. [May. 8th, 2008|01:05 pm]
[Tags|]

Last night, I was called for an event held at the MIT Faculty club. Which is a function space -- things held there need not have much connection to MIT. As always, I had no real idea what I was to do until I showed up, and as is normal, the function hall only knows what's on the function sheet.

Remember: the HOSTS know what's going on and why; the rest of us don't, nor do we entirely care. We make functions happen; to us, it makes no difference if it's a business meeting, an anniversary party, or whatever. Personally, I do try to find out as much as I can about that sort of thing; it rarely makes a difference, but it sometimes does.

So, we read the sheet, and it said that the bar I was doing was sherry only, which is something I'd never seen.

Well, if it was only sherry, I figured I could do this right. After all, part of my WSET certification in wine knowledge includes knowledge of fortified wines, such as sherries and ports. I went into the back of their liquor closet, and found that they had six different types of sherry, so I took them all. It was a good range, actually, from a fino to a Pedro Ximenez.

See, in the United States, people think of "sherry" as one thing -- a sweet dessert wine. And that is ONE kind of sherry. But it's far from the only one.

The sherries that they had were a Manzanilla fino, a dry sack, an Oloroso, two cream sherries -- Harvey's Bristol Cream and one other brand whose name escapes me at the moment -- and a Pedro Ximenez. (Actually, they also had an amontillado, but the beverage manager didn't want me to use that one because it hadn't been opened, and he figured I could do enough with the other ones.)

I lined them up on the bar in that order, and made a display at either end, with a glass of the Manzanilla on one end and a glass of the Pedro Ximenez on the other, so that people could visually see the range of choice they had. Fino sherries are a pale yellow, crisp and dry, while Pedro Ximenez is as dark and sweet as molasses. And the rest of them form a pretty smooth spectrum from one to the other. A cream sherry is a mix of Oloroso and Pedro Ximenez; dry sack is a mix of Oloroso and amontillado (and amontillado is, itself, darker than a fino and lighter than an Oloroso), so it formed a good range.

People were impressed. It turns out that it's just a tradition, dating back a hundred years, that this particular annual meeting always has sherry.

But this was the first time that someone had actually WORKED with that to make it INTERESTING, and people's socks were knocked off. For seventy people, I went through six bottles of sherry (I had backups on most of them -- so I did 1.7 bottles of Manzanilla, 1.2 of Dry Sack, 1.4 of Oloroso, 0.5 of of Bristol and 0.4 of the other, and 1.2 of the Pedro Ximenez). At $140/bottle (served -- that's not the price of the ALCOHOL, that's the price of the bottle, the setup, the liquor liability, the bartender, the glassware, and so forth), I did pretty good business for the Faculty Club. And the guests were impressed, most of them coming back several times to try different varieties and compare.

Sometimes, people luck out. Sometimes, luck of the draw means that people get me as their bartender. There is no other bartender they could have gotten who could have done better, and only a few that could have done as well.
Link20 comments|Leave a comment

One of the reasons we went out to Trivia at the bar is because I live in a neighborhood. [May. 6th, 2008|07:46 am]
On Saturday, when we were at the diner for breakfast, the woman who runs trivia at the bar asked us why we hadn't shown up the previous weeks.

Then, on Sunday, when we went out for pho, the waiter chided Lis for not finishing her soup, because she's too skinny, and then had us wait for a couple minutes after we finished, to introduce us to his wife, and his five-month old baby. Who is ADORABLE.

The pho place is across the street from the bar, by the way.

The diner and our house are one town north of the bar and pho place, but they're only three miles away.
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

"Where's my flying car?" Why I'm not upset about not having mine. [May. 5th, 2008|10:42 pm]
'Cause if I had a flying car, so would other people.

And I drive in Boston.

And then there are other things, too. "Hey, what's the weather look like?" "I dunno -- damn SUVs. . . "
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

Lis and I just got back from the Honey Fitz pub [May. 5th, 2008|10:40 pm]
Our plan was to stop in, grab a beer and a cider, and go home.

As we were drinking, the Sox game was on in front of us. And then the trivia contest started.

I mean, we figured we'd fill out the thing, but forfeit part way through and go home, 'cause we were tired to start with. But, y'know, as long as we were there, we may as well TRY answering the questions.

No, we didn't win. But for a lot of the game, we were within a couple points of the winners. We ended up tied for fifth -- if we'd gotten the final question right, we'd have been tied for third, so it's not like we were even CLOSE. But we had fun.
Link5 comments|Leave a comment

A song. [May. 5th, 2008|07:38 am]
Iron Man
Iron Man
Does whatever an iron can.
Presses pants
Any size
Including pleats,
cuffs and flies
Look out!
Here comes the Iron Man!!!!!!
Link13 comments|Leave a comment

A story I've been working on. [May. 1st, 2008|12:37 am]
So, nearly two years ago, I came up with an idea for a world in which to set a roleplaying game. I got a group together, eventually, to try to play it, but it never got off the ground, mainly due to everyone's crazy schedules. We got character generation, but we never had enough people there to actually start the PLOT, and the thing ended before it began.

Nonetheless, the universe I created just won't leave me alone. I really rather like it. I just didn't have any characters in it, or any stories in it I particularly wanted to tell.

So I stole the characters that the players created, and am working on stealing plotlines from Westerns or other pulp novels, and I've gotten about a page written.

For the record: the main protagonist was created by [info]lagaz; the other character that has a significant speaking role is [info]fibro_witch's. The other two characters are an NPC I created, and a character made by [info]temima, although I'm probably going to significantly rewrite that one. I may or may not use a character created by [info]vonbeck, and I'm probably not going to use the characters created by [info]teddywolf and [info]felis_sidus. Of course, the characters I'm writing are only BASED on the characters those folks were going to play -- I'm creating personalities for them that may have nothing to do with how they envisioned them.

So, yeah.
About a page of a story that's been going through my mind. )
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

A definition of "white male privilege" [Apr. 28th, 2008|06:27 pm]
White male privilege is simply the condition of being treated the way that people are supposed to be treated, by default.

The reason that so many people with it don't see it is because there's nothing to see. It's the condition of LACKING the problems of NOT having it.

This has all sorts of ramifications -- people who say that they're humanists rather than feminists, because they just want equal treatment for everybody; people who consider affirmative action to be reverse racism.

In effect, what everybody WANTS to do is to extend the benefits that white male privilege confers to everybody. But if you don't realize that white male privilege exists, and is something that white males have, you don't realize that, in order to extend those benefits to everybody, you actually DO have to focus on people who AREN'T white males. And just declaring the playing field level doesn't do that. Which is why you DO need things like affirmative action and feminism, rather than just declaring that you are just beyond all that sexism and racism stuff.

(Also -- if you're a "humanist", it means that you are an ethical atheist who derives their morals and ethics from humanity, rather than from a supernatural/spiritual source. The term already exists. So you CAN'T say that you're a "humanist instead of a feminist.")
Link30 comments|Leave a comment

[Apr. 9th, 2008|07:21 am]
What would we need to figure out in order to make solar energy panels using chlorophyll? Plants on Earth have developed the most efficient method to turn photons into another form of energy -- what would we need to figure out in order to use that for our energy needs?

That's just one of the things that keeps popping into my head. There isn't an "energy crisis" on Earth -- what we've got is a "specific form of energy" crisis. We have TONS of energy -- it's coming from that fusion reactor 92 million miles away. Now, OIL is getting short, and natural gas will, too, but that doesn't mean we have an ENERGY shortage -- it just means that we need to start using the energy we are getting.

And, well, after all, the solar radiation is the source of most of the energy on Earth. Sure, we've got some energy from tidal forces, radioactivity, and so forth, but, still, the biggest and most tempting source of energy is that mass of incandescent gas.

And the problem of turning that energy into useful forms while on the surface of the earth? Was solved three billion years ago.
Link24 comments|Leave a comment

Massage therapist recommendations? [Apr. 8th, 2008|11:14 pm]
I paid for a massage today. And it did pretty much exactly no good.

This happens a lot, actually. I KNOW massage helps, because I've had friends give me massages that have helped me feel better, and I can do that for other people. But none of the massages I've actually PAID for have done a whole lot of good.

Any ideas who's good in the general easy-to-get-to-from-Melrose area?
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

Incidentally, if you were wondering what was keeping Lis and me up at night giggling ... [Apr. 2nd, 2008|02:50 pm]
Lis has the reveal up on her blog. I assume most of you have read it already, either at ribarambles.org or on her LJ feed.

We secretly replaced random things around the office with rich, mountain-grown Folger's crystals instant coffee.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

My theories on April Fools' jokes, and pranks and hacks in general [Apr. 1st, 2008|03:28 pm]
Originally, I was planning on having this post be full of rickrolls (links to the music video of Rick Astley's 1987 hit single "Never Gonna Give You Up" that are pretending to be links to other things), but I'm too lazy.

Because, to me, "rickrolling" is an example of "acceptable pranking". Um, mostly. Right now, it's so overdone that it starts to lose something, but, in general, it fits my rules for what's okay in a prank.

Here are some of my rules:
  • The prank may not cause any damage to anything.
  • The prank must be easily undone and it must be easy to get things back to normal.
  • The prank must be designed to avoid negative feelings, with the possible exception of a limited amount of initial confusion.


That last one is really important. If a prank causes embarrassment, humiliation, shock, fear, worry, disappointment . . . it's a bad prank.

Pranks should be designed to engender amusement, wonder, surprise . . .

I think that a lot of what "Improv Everywhere" does counts as "good pranks". Having a random musical in a mall food court? That's a GOOD prank.

When Lis and I design pranks, that's what we go for -- trying to make people's lives just a bit more PLEASANTLY surreal.
Link18 comments|Leave a comment

Being married to Lis . . . [Mar. 31st, 2008|08:56 pm]
Being married to Lis is sometimes like having a slumber party every night, except without parents to yell at you to quiet down and GO TO SLEEP, ALREADY!!

Is it bad when you and your spouse come up with an idea for a prank that keeps sending both of you into total giggle fits for fifteen minutes?

No, we're not telling you what it is, at least not until we figure out how to do it. . .
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

Hebrew school, back to the post-Purim grind. [Mar. 30th, 2008|02:57 pm]
[Tags|]

"Gabe, you are evil and Machiavellian. And that's not where I was intending to go with this discussion. Nonetheless, that IS an interesting idea."

Yep, we're back to discussing Jewish history -- we've finished the Purim stuff, so we're back to normal stuff.

Where "normal" is defined as students considering the instability engendered by having a monotheistic, anti-syncretic region of an empire which is bound together by syncretic polytheism. In which Rome has control of this region, but it's an ongoing potential source of conflict. But, of course, you couldn't abandon it, even if you wanted to, because that would be a show of weakness, and it would encourage other parts of the empire to break away.

Gabe's suggested solution: Rome should have funded and supported an underground anti-Roman organization, and encouraged and nurtured them to take anti-Roman violent acts, giving Rome an excuse to come in with their whole military and raze the place, squashing the potential instability under sheer military might.

After that, we ended up on another tangent, discussing what the mentality of suicide bombers was, and how they justified their own actions to themselves.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the leaders of tomorrow. Seriously, this is a good thing. They don't support the use of agent provocateurs or suicide bombers, but they want to understand how other people WOULD use them, and how to recognize and work against it.

There was a bit of an argument, however, about whether you should use an agent who know's he or she is working for you, who you extract before crushing the resistance movement, or just use a dupe who you kill along with everyone else.

I think I'm going to have to get a few Dover thrift editions of The Prince to hand out to my class. Although I'm not sure there's much in there they haven't figured out, already. . .
Link8 comments|Leave a comment

As long as I've got ONE semi-contentious post up, on feminism, how about another one on the Masons? [Mar. 28th, 2008|03:27 pm]
I posted a couple days ago about thinking about joining the Masons, as a possible way of advancing my career. And one person said that that would be giving myself an unfair advantage, since, if it DID work, it would be an advantage not available to women or atheists. And other people, who are Masons themselves, said that they WOULD feel more comfortable hiring a fellow Mason, since it would be evidence that they could trust their fellow.

So I've been thinking about this, going over pros and cons in my mind.
Read more... )
Link36 comments|Leave a comment

Today is Blog Against Torture Day [Mar. 28th, 2008|07:23 am]
Why I'm Against Torture, By Ian Osmond, Age 34.

The truth is, there are some things that are so simple that they're hard to explain.

So, let me try.

Torture is bad. Kind of definitionally. Torture is what the bad guys do. People who torture are bad guys. Countries that torture are bad guys. I'm not an evil villain, so therefore I am against torture.

It's really that simple. Anyone who makes it more complex that that is lying to themselves.

Sometimes, being evil is easier than being good. That doesn't make it right.

The fact that torture doesn't actually help anything is totally secondary.
Link10 comments|Leave a comment

The nice thing about lesbian separatist radical feminism is that it requires nothing from me. [Mar. 27th, 2008|03:08 pm]
So, a bunch of people on my friends list have been linking to a post that someone wrote last year about the misogyny in Firefly/Serenity. And, y'know, there's actually a lot of interesting stuff you can do with that, but this post was written from a radical feminist point of view, by a lesbian separatist.

And I was just thinking about how EASY radfem is for me to deal with.

See, I'm a man. And so, by lesbian separatist radical feminist logic, I can never understand a woman's point of view. And THAT means that I have no obligation to try.

Now, the way I was raised, I can look at how society is set up, I can see in what ways the deck is stacked to give men more power for being men, I can see how society promotes some sorts of interactions, and values some types of personality traits more than others. In the forms of feminism in which I was raised, I can look at those things, and see if I can find ways to work around them, to change how I think about them, to work to change society to be more equatable, to allow people to be who they are, to respect the contributions of all sorts of people, to value cooperative and consensus-building interactions . . .

But, from a radical feminist point of view, the differences are not cultural, they're inherent, and, as a man, no matter what I do, I won't change.

And that's so cool. That lets me entirely off the hook. By the feminism with which I was raised, I have a responsibility to work toward a more fair and more just world. But by lesbian separatist radical feminism, I can do whatever I want, because, as I have no ability to be different than I am, I have no responsibility to try.
Link102 comments|Leave a comment

I wonder if I should join the Masons. . . [Mar. 25th, 2008|03:25 pm]
I'm sure [info]erik_j_meyer wouldn't mind -- and the Masons are generally looking for folks.

It's just . . . well, I am pretty sure that I know the Freemason Secret Handshake, since the last three hiring managers I've talked to did the same one . . . dunno if they actually WOULD give hiring preference to fellow Masons, but, y'know. . . .
Link24 comments|Leave a comment

I heard one sentence on the news yesterday . . . [Mar. 23rd, 2008|09:28 am]
So, it was just a brief sentence in passing. The newscaster said that the Pentagon said that they had damaged Al Qaeda's ability to expand, because they had captured or killed many of the people who made videos which attracted disaffected Muslim youth.

To me, that says that they have decided that, in Iraq, dissent and free speech are death-penalty offenses.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Stuff that's going on today. [Mar. 22nd, 2008|01:43 pm]
Let's see. There's a production of Twelfth Night at MIT, which I'd like to see. It's the Boston Burlesque Expo main event show tonight. A friend is holding a Green Liqueur and Liquor party. I'd like to get together with [info]temima. And there's at least one other event which I'm forgetting about.

I can't do ALL of these things. . . how come all the cool things happen at once?
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Schpeil 2008 [Mar. 22nd, 2008|11:06 am]
[Tags|, ]

The 2008, Which is to say, the
5768, Purim Schpeil by the
Students of Temple B'Nai
Brith in Somerville,
Massachusetts

Read more... )
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

Some things that are becoming clear. . . . [Mar. 22nd, 2008|09:25 am]
Livejournal.ru is a completely different beast than Livejournal.com. Socially, demographically, culturally, growth potential -- they have nothing in common.

Right now, most young'ns in the Western world are using MySpace and Facebook and the like -- LiveJournal is not really part of the teener crowd so much. Who are we? We're Usenet exiles, science fiction writers, fanficcers, roleplayers. We skew older, and geekier than the general population. An active livejournal.com user is more likely to be a geek, be a pagan, be some other form of "weird".

"Normal people" who blog will be using Blogger or some other specific blogging software. "Normal people" who do social networks will be using MySpace, Facebook, or one of the other dedicated services. We folks on LiveJournal are doing a little of both on the same service.

But livejournal.ru is different. It's mainstream, it's bigger than MySpace and Facebook combined in Russia -- and it's growing. LiveJournal.com is shrinking. To me, that's one of the biggest take-away messages from [info]chipotle post here. Look at that chart. Active users are fewer, while cob-webpages are skyrocketing -- and LJ pays for those.

And, as he points out, the growth is in livejournal.ru.

Is it technically and economically feasible to separate them? SUP paid $30M for LiveJournal -- because it's worth that in Russia. It's not worth anything like that in the West.
Link21 comments|Leave a comment

So, Purim. [Mar. 21st, 2008|08:59 pm]
Purim was a lot of fun, despite the fact that Lis was sick and stayed home asleep.

Let me see: for our Purim schpeil, because people were sick, we had to do last-minute re-casting of Achashverosh, Haman, Chris Crocker, the narrator, Esther, and Julius Caesar. However, the play went off BRILLIANTLY -- the edits which I made since our performance on Sunday, which got a rather lukewarm reception, seem to have worked well.

See, here's the way that I go about making a funny play. Attempt to make a funny play, perform it, then cut out every line that doesn't get a laugh.

The play went from twelve script pages to ten, and from a running time of fifteen minutes to ten minutes.

I'll probably post a "final performance script" at some point.

Charlie's Hillary Clinton costume was AMAZING. He's got blond hair and fair skin, and he showed up in a black suit jacket, white shirt, black pants, and a strand of pearls. He looked perfect.

I also brought a few bottles of booze to share around -- I brought some calvados (French apple brandy), absinthe, overproof bourbon, and Sailor Jerry's spiced rum. All of them were very popular. And I baked hamentashen, which were also well-received -- I heard at least one person express shock that they were poppyseed hamentashen, but good.
Link5 comments|Leave a comment

How I know I'm lame. [Mar. 21st, 2008|08:51 pm]
That boycott was freakin' hard, man. It's tough for me to not just blather on to y'all about whatever the heck is on my mind.
Link12 comments|Leave a comment

Purim tonight! [Mar. 20th, 2008|03:31 pm]
So, if you don't have a place to go for megillah reading in Boston, well, there are a lot of good places around.

One of them is Temple B'nai Brith in Somerville, right near Winter Hill. That's where I'll be, and it's where our Purim Schpeil will be performed. Now, I've cut, like, two pages from the script, so I'm hoping it will be tighter and flow better.

I just got email that the person playing Haman is sick, so we'll be doing re-casting and re-shuffling parts, but that's to be expected. I certainly hope it's going to be good.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

My thoughts on the latest SUP . . . thing. [Mar. 19th, 2008|03:14 pm]
First, I don't think the one-day boycott with accomplish anything. Nonetheless, I will be participating, out of respect to [info]beckyzoole, who called it. Also, because I'll be at Purim celebrations anyway.

I was going to write a post about how it was always a good idea to look at things from other people's point of view, and we should look at how this whole thing appeared from Anton Nosik's point of view, about why he feels like HE'S being victimized, about why he feels he's being bullied, and what that says about him and his mindset, about what is in his mind, and how this should influence how we approach him.

Then I re-read his interview, and said, "Fuck it. He's just an asshole."
Link12 comments|Leave a comment

For no good reason, I thought I'd make a quick blog posting on the "ceremony of wine tasting." [Mar. 15th, 2008|09:19 pm]
[Tags|]

You know, that whole thing where the person smells the cork, and tastes the wine, before letting the waiter or wine steward pour?

Actually, all the things in that are for specific reasons. And they're not too difficult to understand.

Okay. So the first thing is that the server puts the cork in front of you. You can feel free to ignore it, but there are three things that you can do with it: smell it, feel it, and look at it. And they all have a purpose.

See, there are two main categories of wine: fine wine, and table wine. Table wine is stuff you just drink. You don't go through this whole ceremony -- you just pour from the jug, or the box, or the bottle, and drink the stuff. There's a lot of really good table wine out there -- I've got two boxes of Australian table wine on my counter right now -- a Shiraz and a Chardonnay, about twenty glasses of wine per box, for seventeen dollars. And it's REALLY good stuff. The difference between "fine wine" and "table wine" is that "fine wine" is for sipping and tasting, and "table wine" is for drinking.

The whole "ceremony" thing is only done for "fine wine". And the vast majority of fine wines have the name of the vineyard or manufacturer printed on the side of the cork. So that's the first thing you're looking for -- does the name on the cork match the name on the bottle?

See, it's pretty easy to soak off a wine label. So it'd be pretty trivial to take a cheap bottle of wine, soak off the label of an expensive bottle of wine, and slap that label on the cheap bottle. And then sell the expensive bottle to someone else, or just drink it yourself. And it would look exactly the same.

But it's a lot harder to replace a cork. So if the side of the cork matches the label, it's probably the right wine.

The second thing you do is feel it, roll it around in your fingers. What you're feeling for is to make sure that the cork doesn't feel all dry and crumbly. Because if the cork is dry and crumbly, then the wine has gone bad. You can pretty much tell from just that.

I think all of you know that making food using microbes has all sorts of potential to screw up. Cheese, wine, beer, cured meats, other fermented foods -- they're great when they work, but you know that there's a real chance that some microbe other than the one you were going for is gonna get in there first, and make whatever it was into something totally nasty. So you maintain the conditions under which the food matures, to make sure that only the microbes you want are doing stuff.

If the cork is dry and crumbly, then it has become permeable to other microbes. And so you know that some other microbe has gotten in there and screwed stuff up.

That's what the smelling the cork is for, too. If the cork smells like wet dog, wet basement, or swamp, you don't even go on to tasting the wine.

So, what are you doing with the cork? You're checking to see if the cork is totally gross. If it's disgusting, you don't drink the wine. Simple, hunh?

So, let's say the cork isn't totally gross. So then you get a little bit poured into your glass. So, first, you look at it. If there's little things floating in it, you don't drink it. If it's just sort of cloudy, that may well be just how they make it, and that's not a problem. But if there's stuff in it? It fails, and you don't taste it.

Then you smell it. If it smells like vinegar, wet dog, crap, or stinky feet, you don't drink it.

Finally, you taste it. Generally speaking, if there was something seriously wrong, you would have noticed by now, so. mainly, you're just confirming that the stuff is okay.

See, that's the thing about the "wine ceremony." People think that it's a way to see if the wine is good. It's not. It's just to confirm that the wine isn't undrinkably bad.

So, there you go. Now, the next time you order a bottle of wine, you can go through the ceremony with confidence, knowing that each of the steps has an actual purpose -- to keep you from putting something that smells like crappy wet dog feet in your mouth.
Link27 comments|Leave a comment

So, I finally got around to asking my maternal grandfather something I'd been vaguely wondering [Mar. 12th, 2008|11:13 pm]
So, if you want to look up my grandfather in dental journals or whatever, his name is Dr Norman Becker. No middle name -- his family was too poor to afford one, or even an initial (Harry S Truman, of course, came from a family that could only afford the "S", but no name to go along with it).

The folks at his office call him "Dr Becker" if there's no chance of confusion, but usually call him "Dr Norman", in order to distinguish him from Dr David Becker, and Dr Todd Belf-Becker, his son and grandson respectively. (Is my grandfather a happy man? He loves dentistry, loves teaching about dentistry, and works with his son and grandson, whom he loves, and who also love dentistry.) Folks who he knows through the dental community call him "Norman" or "Norm".

But his family and close friends call him "Tuny." He's "Papa Tuny" to me, my sister, and all of our cousins. So, tonight, I asked Papa if he got his nickname after Gene Tunney, the heavyweight boxing champion from 1926-28 (and one of the greatest boxers of all time). He laughed and said that, no, he didn't, but he DID have the nickname when he was a small child not long after Tunney was the champ.

No, actually his nickname is because his name is Naphtali. As well as Norman. Like most Jews of his generation, really like most children-of-immigrants of his generation, he had a name, and an English version of the name, which he used in different contexts. So, his mother called him "Naphtali." Or "Naphtaleleh." Because, in Yiddish, to make a pet name, you add "eleh" to the end.

His childhood playmates had trouble with "Naphtaleleh", and came out with something closer to "Naphtaneleh", which morphed into "Taneleh", then "Taneh", then "Tuny". And that's what everybody's called him since his was in single digits.

But I don't think he really minds the connection to Gene Tunney . . . .
Link10 comments|Leave a comment

I guess I'll combine a bunch of the content-generator questions. . . [Mar. 12th, 2008|12:06 pm]
So, there have been a bunch of question-generation-questions floating around that people have been posting.

So, I'll just do them all at once.
1. Anything you want to tell me anonymously? Feel free. I don't disable anonymous comments, nor do I track IPs.
2. Any really basic questions about me that you want to know? I mean, we all start reading LJs "in media res" as it were, and so there may be totally basic stuff about me that you don't know that you want to know. Feel free to ask them.
3. Anything that you want me to blog about that I don't usually blog about? Feel free to ask.

Actually, feel free to do any of these things any time you want. In general, it's not IMPOSSIBLE to offend me, but it's hard to do accidentally. Feel free to ask questions or make comments or whatever -- I'm hard to offend, and, when I DO get offended, I usually just explain why, and talk about it, and then forgive and make up once everything's cleared up.

Oh -- I don't guarantee answers to anything. I'll usually answer most questions that don't involve other people's privacy, but not always.
Link12 comments|Leave a comment

I just heard that Dave Stevens died, after a battle with leukemia [Mar. 11th, 2008|03:18 pm]
Dave Stevens was a comic book artist, whose best known work was The Rocketeer, which was also made into a (pretty decent, I think) movie by Disney in 1991. The comic -- and movie -- was a retro-pulp-style work.

But let's a James-Burke-Connections-like look at some of the other effects that Stevens had on popular culture, just through that one work.

The hero's girlfriend in the comic was an "art model" named "Betty". Who looked an awful lot like Bettie Page. (In the movie, she was changed to "Jenny", and the Bettie Page homage was dropped. 'Cause it was a Disney movie. Still, she was played by Jennifer Connely, so it was still good.)

Dave Stevens is credited for creating a renewal of interest in Bettie Page. And I suspect that the current revival of burlesque wouldn't have come about without that interest. So I'd argue that Dave Stevens is indirectly, but necessarily, responsible for things like the Boston Babydolls.
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

Just called some wildlife removal people to deal with our raccoon situation. [Mar. 11th, 2008|01:19 pm]
See, in general, I like raccoons, so it makes me a little happier that the effective methods of getting rid of raccoons do not involve hurting them, normally. Basically, what you need to do is evict them from where they're living in your house and keep them out. But if you hurt them, they end up hiding in the burrow -- which is your house, and your best case scenario is an injured or dead wild animal in your building, which Isn't Good.

So you have to do things like one-way doors, or wait for them to leave for the morning and THEN block it off or something. They end up homeless, but, as it's spring, they find another place to live.

If they've got pups, you have to evict the whole family, because otherwise, they'll come back to rescue their kids, and they're smarter than you are.

As I've been saying, if we could just get the 'coons to pay rent, I'd not have a problem with them. If we could get them to stay in one spot, not dig around, and pay maybe fifty, a hundred bucks a month, depending on how much space they needed, I'd be cool with them. Heck, even if they paid us in fruit or something, it'd be SOMETHING. Maybe the could do yard work. I dunno. But I don't speak raccoon, so I can't make that offer, and, even though they could probably hold a pen, I don't know if they can READ, so I don't think they'd understand the lease.

Our upstairs neighbor says that a raccoon walked past his window, and he put his hand on the glass, and said something to the effect of "Nyah, nyah, there's glass here and you can't get in!"

The raccoon looked at him, and put its paw on the other side of the glass just over where his hand was.

I like raccoons, and maybe they can find a spot in a shed or a tree right nearby and hang out, y'know? I wouldn't have a problem with that. I just don't want them digging in our walls.
Link14 comments|Leave a comment

What was I like in High School [Mar. 11th, 2008|12:23 pm]
Read more... )
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

Dear Mom: [Mar. 10th, 2008|08:46 am]
Happy birthday, Mom!

Today is [info]rebmommy's birthday. Without her, I wouldn't be here, so, for that reason alone, I'm glad she exists. But, y'know, the world is also just generally a better place with her in it. I love you, Mom.
Link2 comments|Leave a comment

Just got home from Hebrew school. [Mar. 9th, 2008|12:41 pm]
The kids sent me home with re-writes.

Haman's actor demanded a death scene.

He wants Mercutio's.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

Successful until the last step. [Mar. 8th, 2008|08:04 pm]
I'm a bartender, and I've been working on re-creation pre-Prohibition cocktails, using fresh ingredients and classic liquors and liqueurs. Obviously, back before there was corn syrup, bartenders didn't use corn syrup, but Americans in the Nineteenth century had quite a sweet tooth in their drinking. Sugar, in many different forms, was an integral part of almost every drink. In the old days, a cocktail definitionally had liquor, a sweet syrup of some sort (maybe just simple syrup), some bitters, and probably one more ingredient -- a juice, or a liqueur, or just SOMETHING else.

Well, one of the sweet syrups that they used was Grenadine syrup, but the Grenadine they used had about the same relationship to the stuff we have as the Maraschino cherries they used have to ours -- they're similar, in some sort of sense -- if you've had the real thing, you can sort of taste what the modern thing is TRYING to do -- but, they're not very close at all. (A "maraschino cherry", by the old definition, is a sour cherry marinated and stored in a thick syrup/paste mixture of Maraschino liqueur and sugar. Luxardo still manufactures them, and if you see a jar, pick one up -- they're really rather good.)

Grenadine is a very easy syrup to make: one part sugar to two parts pomegranate juice. You can add a couple drops of orange blossom water, but it's not strictly necessary. The only reason, as far as I can tell, that the real stuff fell out of favor is that, for decades, you just couldn't GET pomegranate juice in the United States. But now that we all love our antioxidants, there's no reason to use the Rose's Artificial Stuff any more. Well, unless you want to, I guess.

So, I decided to make some, for the first time. I put the sugar and pomegranate juice into a pot, and set the flame on reasonably high to get it simmering. Once it started simmering, I reduced the flame and simmered it for about a half hour, until it had reduced and thickened somewhat. I changed the heat a few times, and did do a full boil for a couple minutes to caramelize the sugar; in the future, I'm not sure if I'd do that. The darker caramelized sugar flavor tastes more like the Rose's stuff we're used to, but it overpowers a lot of the pomegranate flavor. I was tasting it as I went (using a new teaspoon each time -- I'm sanitary), and it was coming along nicely.

Eventually, it finished, and I poured it into a glass bottle for storage.

Then I put the bottle in the sink, not noticing the puddle of water, and the jar cracked, and my quart of Grenadine went down the drain.

Oh, well. At least it was down the drain rather than on the floor.

(x-posted to [info]failed_recipe)
Link12 comments|Leave a comment

Wow. That's actually COHERENT! [Mar. 8th, 2008|10:52 am]
So, this is the random haiku generator. It looks at your journal, and takes words from it, and does a bit of crunching, and hopefully comes out with a bit of text with a five-seven-five syllable count which is grammatically correct.

Every once in a while, it comes up with something that even makes sense. This was the very first result I got -- not even hitting "refresh" over and over to get something good. (Which, of course, is a perfectly fair thing to do.)

Haiku2 for xiphias
the composition
of your emotional life
a loss of a job
@
Created by Grahame
Link12 comments|Leave a comment

You know, if anyone was wondering what to get me for my birthday, or whatever other occasion. . . [Mar. 6th, 2008|12:48 pm]
Help cleaning and organizing. Really, that's all I need. I'm making a great deal of progress on the pantry and kitchen, but there is still lots more to do.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

I was thinking about the Indiana Jones movies [Mar. 6th, 2008|10:43 am]
[Tags|]

A couple days ago, someone on my friends list was talking about showing his young daughter RAIDERS for the first time, and I started thinking about the series -- specifically the second movie, generally considered to be the worst of the lot.

Now, there are a lot of problems with it, most obviously the female lead, and second-most obviously, the kid sidekick, and third-most obviously, the really grim subject matter (human sacrifice is fine -- famine and starving children? Not so much for a two-fisted pulp adventurer).

But another thing that bugged people, if you'll pardon the expression, was the gross-out-for-gross-out's-sake bits. The dinner scene, most obviously, with things like live snakes and eyeball soup.

But the bit that REALLY got people was the "chilled monkey brains," served in an actual monkey's head.

But I think I know what Spielberg was thinking with that, and I don't see why people were so upset.

After all, there's no wrong way to eat a rhesus.

(Alternative: "After all, in ET, Spielberg had already shown characters eating rhesus pieces.")
Link23 comments|Leave a comment

A sudden realization about the Marvel "Civil War" storyline last year [Mar. 6th, 2008|09:03 am]
I didn't follow the storyline, so could someone who did let me know if this was brought up?

There is already a Marvel universe character who not only had the same political philosophy that Tony Stark was espousing, but who had actual practical experience in using it.

Victor Von Doom believes in the philosophy of security over freedom, and actually manages to PROTECT his people. From what we understand, Latveria is a safe and pleasant place to live, with no freedom or civil liberties, but also no crime or pollution, and entirely safe. So, was there any discussion of simply turning the United States over to Doctor Doom in order to gain the world that that faction wanted?

And, for that matter, if Doctor Doom was an option, what percentage of Americans do you think would vote for him? Sadly, he's a better option than a lot of 'em, who want to take away all the freedoms that Doom would, but who don't have his proven track record of actually DOING something with them . . .
Link10 comments|Leave a comment

LITTLE BROTHER by Cory Doctorow [Mar. 5th, 2008|10:11 pm]
So, Patrick Nielsen-Hayden sent Lis an advance copy of LITTLE BROTHER, Cory Doctorow's forthcoming YA novel about a teenage hacker who fights for freedom after being swept up by the Department of Homeland Security.

I've been reading it all day, and I've been shaking. Because it's all too plausible. Except for the parts where the good guys win.

But, perhaps, if this book is a big success, it'll help the odds of the good guys winning.

It's really well written, and I hope it's a smash hit. And I think Doctorow has written the book that will top the banned books list for next year.

It's also fun, and a good read.
Link5 comments|Leave a comment

A couple of followups on previous posts [Mar. 5th, 2008|06:28 pm]
[Tags|]

Re: depression:

I want to clarify that what I was posting was NOT supposed to be exhaustive. It was merely supposed to be describing what I experience, personally. Several people posted really interesting and enlightening comments about what THEIR depression is like, and how it differs from mine. I encourage people to go back and read the comments to get more perspectives.

I also encourage other people who suffer from depression to blog about what their experience is like. I hope that, maybe, by getting more descriptions from the inside, people will be able to, y'know, come up with ideas about what depression is -- or, perhaps, what depressions ARE. I suspect that "depression" is a CATEGORY of diseases, not a single disease. Like "cancer". There are many different cancers out there, and a treatment for one may be useless, or harmful, for another. And perhaps, if we got more descriptions of different kinds of depression, we could get better diagnosis, and perhaps, from there, we could get better treatment.

I also wouldn't mind hearing from therapists on my friends list if this sort of descriptive stuff is useful.

In an entirely other direction, I was wondering if I had a distinctive authorial "voice." Specifically, I was wondering if it is possible for people reading the Purim shpeil to figure out which scenes I wrote the dialog for, and which scenes were written by others.
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

I've been talking a lot about depression recently [Mar. 4th, 2008|08:35 pm]
[Tags|]

You know, since I declared war on depression at the end of January, one of my friends has gotten her doctor to change her meds to some that worked better, one friend has decided that he has had a depression problem all his life and is going to find a therapist to start working on it, and one has decided that she deserves to have Nice Things in her life and not have everyone dump on her all the time.

I'm kinda happy about that, y'know?

Anyway, because I've been talking about it, I decided I'd write a little about what depression is like for me.

The first thing I want to do is to distinguish between three things which can all be called "depression", may externally look similar, but which are fundamentally different.

They are sadness and melancholy, situational depression, and clinical depression.

When I talk about the thing which I have, which I consider my enemy, which I consider to be an evil and pernicious disease -- I'm referring ONLY to that third one.
Read more... )
Link55 comments|Leave a comment

A fun place in Malden Center we just found [Mar. 4th, 2008|02:45 pm]
Lis is working from home today, so we went out to a buffet in Malden Center. Unfortunately, Fu Long's really disappointed us. We knew we were in trouble when we noticed that they now have tablecloths . . .

The buffet is one dollar more expensive -- and a full steam table smaller than it used to be. Ah, well. It was okay, but it wasn't the amazing buffet I remember.

However -- as we were walking from our parking space to the restaurant, we saw, RIGHT around the corner, a place advertising bubble tea in the window. As bubble tea is one of the things Lis loves, we went in after we finished lunch.

There were a half-dozen kids -- they looked Vietnamese or maybe Cambodian to me -- sitting around one table, with bubble teas and smoothies and so forth in front of them. There were flat-screen TVs on all the walls, playing Vietnamese music. I know it was Vietnamese, because it was karaoke -- the lyrics were on the screen.

It's a bubble-tea / karaoke teenage hangout spot. A karaoke cafe, rather than a karaoke bar. I feel like I'm a generation too old to hang out there, but for you young whippersnappers, maybe you want to check it out.

The tea is amazing. It's fresh-made stuff instead of the stuff from mixes like everywhere else we've had.
Link9 comments|Leave a comment

The Purim schpeil script [Mar. 3rd, 2008|10:18 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Script for the schpeil under cut. If you're planning on seeing it, maybe you don't want to read it. Up to you, really.

Read more... )
Link9 comments|Leave a comment

The creative process of Purim [Mar. 3rd, 2008|03:58 pm]
[Tags|, ]

"I don't want to be Senator Obama any more. I want to be a guard."

"I don't know if the shpeil is even going to HAVE any guards."
Read more about the glamorous life of a Sunday school teacher! )
Link17 comments|Leave a comment

Weird things one finds out randomly. [Feb. 27th, 2008|10:49 pm]
[Tags|, ]

I just found a claim that the quote "Jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today," from Alice's Adventures Through the Looking-Glass, is actually supposed to be a mnemonic to help remember the distinction between the Latin words "nunc" and "iam".

Can someone who actually KNOWS Latin sanity-check this claim for me?
Link8 comments|Leave a comment

Lis had a very long day at work. [Feb. 27th, 2008|08:54 pm]
[Tags|]

So now she's chilling out with a Queen concert on DVD, a bowl of soup, and an Orangina with Pimm's in it. I think her brain will be okay soon.
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

A brilliant demonstration of Newtonian physics. [Feb. 27th, 2008|05:43 pm]
[Tags|]

I encourage all of you physics teachers to use this in your classroom.

Um, the video. Maybe not re-creating the experiment. Which was to roll a bowling ball out of a car window onto a ramp.



(In the comments, the people who did this do explain that they DID understand the physics involved -- they just figured that the guy driving would keep going, and the friction from the ramp and air resistance would cause the ball to drop behind, and next to, the car. Unfortunately, the guy took his foot off the gas, so the car decelerated every bit as much as the ball, and the ramp spun slightly when the ball hit it, imparting some lateral motion. Apparently, this video was sitting on the guy's hard drive for five years, but he finally decided to put it up on YouTube so that the whole world could share.)
Link13 comments|Leave a comment

Did I mention that I have a new favorite wine? [Feb. 20th, 2008|09:30 pm]
[Tags|]

I can't recall if I blogged about the Boston Wine Expo or not. Anyway, when I was there, I tried a New Zealand Riesling. It had the "petrol" note that Riesling is known for, but also the tropical fruit that New Zealand is known for. There are now two or three vineyards which are shipping the stuff to the USA -- I don't know about distribution anywhere else. Y'all have to try this stuff. (I assume you Kiwis already can get the stuff.)
Link10 comments|Leave a comment

You know, I did an okay job bodging stuff together. [Feb. 20th, 2008|04:16 pm]
[Tags|]

Right now, there are folks in the basement replacing the furnace for the first floor, the one that died and the fire department came and tagged out.

And I've also been taking breaks recently by going through my LJ and tagging old entries. Speaking of tagging, and all.

http://xiphias.livejournal.com/304199.html

Beginning of March, 2006. That's when the now-dead furnace caught on fire. I "fixed" it, at least enough to get it running, and I kept it running for two weeks shy of two years. We've had two extra years to budget for replacing this thing.

We're not using the old, salvage boiler that Dad found. As long as we were putting the thing in, and as long as MORE than half the cost is installation, we figured we deserved a NEW boiler.
Link6 comments|Leave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]